Skip to content

Phase Summary

flowchart LR
subgraph Foundation
A[What is PE?]
B[How LLMs Understand]
C[Prompt Anatomy]
end
subgraph Core Skills
D[System/User/Assistant]
E[Zero/Few Shot]
F[Role/Persona]
G[Context Engineering]
H[Output Formatting]
end
subgraph Structured Output
I[JSON & Structured]
J[Prompt Templates]
K[Prompt Chaining]
end
subgraph Advanced Patterns
L[Chain of Thought]
M[Tree of Thought]
N[ReAct]
O[Self-Consistency]
P[Step-Back]
Q[Meta Prompting]
end
subgraph Production
R[Optimization]
S[Testing]
T[Versioning]
U[Evaluation]
V[Security]
W[Production Deploy]
end
A --> B --> C
C --> D --> E --> F --> G --> H
H --> I --> J --> K
K --> L --> M --> N --> O --> P --> Q
Q --> R --> S --> T --> U --> V --> W
style Foundation fill:#3b82f6,color:#fff
style Core Skills fill:#8b5cf6,color:#fff
style Structured Output fill:#06b6d4,color:#fff
style Advanced Patterns fill:#22c55e,color:#000
style Production fill:#f59e0b,color:#000

[INSTRUCTION] + [CONTEXT] + [INPUT] + [CONSTRAINTS] + [OUTPUT FORMAT] + [EXAMPLES]
TypeDescriptionWhen to Use
SystemBase instructionsAlways
UserThe actual requestEvery request
AssistantExample responsesFew-shot learning
Type# of ExamplesBest For
Zero-shot0Simple tasks
One-shot1Clear pattern tasks
Few-shot2-5Complex or nuanced tasks

PatternKey IdeaBest For
Chain of ThoughtStep-by-step reasoningMath, logic, complex problems
Tree of ThoughtMultiple reasoning pathsOpen-ended problems, creativity
ReActReason → Act → ObserveAgent-based tasks
Self-ConsistencyMultiple paths → majority voteHigh-stakes decisions
Step-BackAbstract first → detailsComplex domain problems
Meta PromptingPrompts that generate promptsPrompt optimization

ParameterRangeEffect
Temperature0-1Lower = more deterministic
Top P0-1Lower = more focused
Max TokensVariesResponse length limit
Frequency Penalty0-2Reduce repetition
Presence Penalty0-2Encourage new topics

flowchart TD
Q1[What's the task?]
Q1 -->|"Simple, factual"| ZERO["Zero-shot<br/>✓ Quick<br/>✓ Cheap"]
Q1 -->|"Needs examples"| FEW["Few-shot<br/>✓ Clear pattern<br/>✓ Consistent"]
Q1 -->|"Requires reasoning"| CoT{"Single or<br/>multiple paths?"}
Q1 -->|"Needs actions"| REACT["ReAct<br/>✓ Agents<br/>✓ Tool use"]
Q1 -->|"Creative/open"| ToT["Tree of Thought<br/>✓ Exploration<br/>✓ Creativity"]
CoT -->|Single| CHAIN["Chain of Thought<br/>✓ Step-by-step<br/>✓ Reliable"]
CoT -->|Multiple| SELF["Self-Consistency<br/>✓ High accuracy<br/>✓ Multiple runs"]
style ZERO fill:#3b82f6,color:#fff
style FEW fill:#8b5cf6,color:#fff
style CHAIN fill:#22c55e,color:#000
style ToT fill:#06b6d4,color:#fff
style REACT fill:#f59e0b,color:#000
style SELF fill:#ef4444,color:#fff

TermDefinition
PromptThe input text given to an LLM to guide its response
System PromptBase instructions that define the model’s behavior
User PromptThe user’s actual request or query
Assistant PromptExample responses used for few-shot learning
TemperatureControls randomness of output (0 = deterministic)
TokenThe basic unit of text an LLM processes (~0.75 words)
Context WindowMaximum tokens an LLM can process in one request
Chain of ThoughtPrompting technique that elicits step-by-step reasoning
ReActReasoning + Acting pattern for agent-based tasks
RAGRetrieval-Augmented Generation — combining prompts with retrieved context
Structured OutputGenerating formatted output (JSON, XML, etc.)
Prompt InjectionAttack where malicious input overrides instructions
GuardrailsSafety constraints applied to LLM inputs and outputs
LLM-as-a-JudgeUsing an LLM to evaluate outputs of another LLM
Few-ShotProviding examples of expected behavior in the prompt

#Practice
1Be specific and clear
2Provide context before asking
3Use examples for complex tasks
4Specify output format explicitly
5Break complex tasks into steps
6Use role/persona for tone and expertise
7Iterate based on evaluation
#Practice
1Version all prompts
2Test before deploying
3Monitor latency, cost, quality
4Implement fallbacks
5A/B test changes
6Secure against injection
7Automate deployment pipeline

MistakeWhy It’s Harmful
Vague instructionsModel fills gaps incorrectly
Too much contextWastes tokens, dilutes focus
No output formatInconsistent responses
Skipping evaluationCan’t measure improvement
No versioningCan’t roll back bad changes
Over-engineeringSimple prompts often work best
Ignoring securityVulnerable to injection

pre_deployment:
prompt:
- [ ] Tested on 10+ edge cases
- [ ] Evaluation score meets threshold
- [ ] No PII in system prompt
- [ ] Output format validated
infrastructure:
- [ ] Prompt registered in registry
- [ ] Version tagged
- [ ] Fallback configured
- [ ] Monitoring in place
security:
- [ ] Input sanitization enabled
- [ ] Output validation configured
- [ ] Rate limiting active
- [ ] Injection tests passed

  • What is prompt engineering?
  • Name three prompt patterns
  • Difference between system and user prompts
  • When would you use few-shot over zero-shot?
  • How does Chain of Thought improve reasoning?
  • Design a prompt for a customer support bot
  • How would you evaluate prompt quality in production?
  • Design a prompt deployment pipeline
  • How do you handle prompt injection?
  • Design a prompt governance framework for 50 engineers
  • How do you balance cost, latency, and quality?
  • How would you version prompts across multiple models?
1. Understand the use case
2. Choose the right pattern
3. Design the prompt structure
4. Evaluate and iterate
5. Productionize with monitoring

flowchart TD
A[Phase 5: Prompt Engineering] --> B[Phase 6: Retrieval Systems & RAG]
B --> C[Phase 7: AI Agents & Multi-Agent Systems]
C --> D[Phase 8: AI Frameworks & Ecosystem]
D --> E[Phase 9: Production AI Engineering]
E --> F[Phase 10: Real-World Projects]
style A fill:#8b5cf6,color:#fff
style F fill:#22c55e,color:#000

✓ What Prompt Engineering is — and why it exists ✓ How LLMs understand prompts — tokens, instructions, context ✓ Prompt anatomy — instruction, context, input, constraints, format, examples ✓ System, user, and assistant roles — how to use each effectively ✓ Zero-shot, one-shot, few-shot — when to use each ✓ Role and persona prompting — improving response quality ✓ Context engineering — giving models the right information ✓ Output formatting — Markdown, JSON, XML, YAML, and more ✓ JSON and structured outputs — reliable, parseable responses ✓ Prompt templates — reusable, parameterized prompts ✓ Prompt chaining — breaking complex tasks into steps ✓ Chain of Thought — step-by-step reasoning ✓ Tree of Thought — exploring multiple reasoning paths ✓ ReAct prompting — reasoning + action for agents ✓ Self-Consistency — majority voting for reliable answers ✓ Step-Back Prompting — abstract first, then details ✓ Meta Prompting — prompts that generate prompts ✓ Prompt optimization — compressing, refining, simplifying ✓ Prompt testing — unit tests, regression tests, golden datasets ✓ Prompt versioning — registries, history, rollbacks ✓ Prompt evaluation — LLM-as-a-Judge, metrics, quality gates ✓ Prompt security — PII, jailbreaks, guardrails ✓ Prompt injection — direct, indirect, leakage, defenses ✓ Production prompt engineering — scaling, monitoring, cost optimization


Next: Continue to Phase 6 — Retrieval Systems & Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) where you’ll learn how prompts combine with external knowledge to build intelligent AI applications.